In Defence of a ‘No First Use’ Nuclear Doctrine

Re:In Defence of a ‘No First Use’ Nuclear Doctrine by solotronics on Friday August 19, 2016 @12:44AM (#12318002)

I imagine it could be a tactic to launch a single ICBM from a submarine at yourself to give cause to launch a nuclear offense. In reality it doesn't matter who shoots first against a determined enemy who is willing to execute a false flag.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In Defence of a ‘No First Use’ Nuclear Doctrine by pluma on Friday August 19, 2016 @05:02AM (#12318776)

Or you could just launch the nukes anyway because if there is a thermonuclear war it doesn't matter what asshole started it for which reason unless there's someone alive to hold you accountable when the dust has settled.

Only the worst kind of human would ever actually use a nuclear weapon in any scenario.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In Defence of a ‘No First Use’ Nuclear Doctrine by thomasruns on Friday August 19, 2016 @03:02AM (#12318384)

I believe you're looking for infowars or some other bs site where conspiracy nutjobs hang out.

[ Parent | on HN ]