Re:Otto joins Uber
by jonknee on Thursday August 18, 2016 @07:53PM
(#12317099)
I don't think the number would rise, at least not for a long time. Trucks would be utilized a lot more hours per day, which is what matters. There are currently pretty strict rules for how many hours a driver can work, but if you can sleep while the truck drives itself all of a sudden you have an asset that can work nearly 24/7.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Otto joins Uber
by BurningFrog on Thursday August 18, 2016 @11:05PM
(#12317736)
When something becomes cheaper, demand always increases.
By how much varies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticity_(economics)) but not that it happens.
Obviously, but by working more hours a day supply increases even though there aren't more trucks. The same thing will happen with large pools of shared autonomous cars--each car doing more work per day even though there are less cars.
Re:Otto joins Uber
by BurningFrog on Friday August 19, 2016 @01:53PM
(#12321937)
OK, we're talking about slightly different things.
I'm talking about more "truck miles" being produced, while you're talking about the absolute number of trucks.
Now that we understand each other, there isn't much left to argue about :)
More hours per day equates to more trucks total. If the transit between San Fransisco and Nashville suddenly takes half as long, we can reasonably assume that the number of trucks between San Francisco and Nashville will rise (maybe not double, but certainly a lot, and with reduced costs, who knows, maybe double or more).