News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bus1: a new Linux interprocess communication proposal by dozzie on Thursday August 18, 2016 @04:23AM (#12311058)
> You can't pass file descriptors over sockets.

Good that my code doesn't know this. It would stop working.

> The descriptors and authentication part is key, [...]

If by "authentication" you mean "checking PID/UID/GID", we already have both in unix sockets.

Re:Bus1: a new Linux interprocess communication proposal by CJefferson on Thursday August 18, 2016 @04:43AM (#12311150)
How do you pass a file descriptor through a socket? They just take bytes?

If you mean "I send some bytes that describes the file to open, and keep my processes in sync manually", of course you can do that, but true passing would allow a number of cool things.

Re:Bus1: a new Linux interprocess communication proposal by ahoka on Thursday August 18, 2016 @04:49AM (#12311173)
By passing it as ancillary data: http://linux.die.net/man/3/cmsg
Re:Bus1: a new Linux interprocess communication proposal by saynsedit on Thursday August 18, 2016 @09:01AM (#12312143)