News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rate Limits by michaelt on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @06:31PM (#12308983)
Oh, that's great! I didn't realise, from the rate limit page, that the exemption form exists.

If I wanted to issue certs for a few hundred microservices running in a VPC, assuming I could get them to DNS validate, do you think I'd get approved for a rate limit exemption? Or are exemptions more of a well-you-have-to-have-a-really-good-reason thing?

Re:Rate Limits by viraptor on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @08:02PM (#12309480)
Are they public microservices? You mentioned VPC, so if they're not, you may be interested in running your own CA internally. Anchor [1] was written pretty much for that purpose, but with even faster certificate cycling by default (days, not months). Of course that's for internal services only - anything internet-facing would need a trusted CA.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/anchor

Re:Rate Limits by eridius on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @07:32PM (#12309344)
In your case, why not use multi-name certificates? According to the article, Let's Encrypt lets you request up to 100 names per certificate, so you could cover all your microservices with just a few certs.
Re:Rate Limits by j4cob on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @07:45PM (#12309416)
For your use case, I'd recommend that you either combine them using SAN certificates, as one commenter suggested, or issue them over the span of a few weeks. Processing rate limit requests is one of the few non-automated tasks we do, and we really try to keep the volume to a minimum so we don't get overwhelmed.