Re:Snowden: Hack of an NSA server is not unprecedented, publ...
by runjake on Tuesday August 16, 2016 @11:31AM
(#12298082)
> Plus in another comment of yours you claimed to know how General Atomics MQ-1C Gray Eagle
He spelled it "Grey Eagle". It's unlikely one can actually speak "professionally" about a program when they can't spell it correctly.
If you're part of the program, you're seeing/typing/writing the name "Gray Eagle" day in/day out.
Re:Snowden: Hack of an NSA server is not unprecedented, publ...
by irishcoffee on Tuesday August 16, 2016 @12:20PM
(#12298466)
Heh, if you're part of the program, you may also call it 280, or 64-bit. But, you'd only know that if, ya know, you're actually part of the program.
Re:Snowden: Hack of an NSA server is not unprecedented, publ...
by solipsism on Tuesday August 16, 2016 @03:05PM
(#12299769)
Oh no, I'm part of the program now!
[dead]
Re:Snowden: Hack of an NSA server is not unprecedented, publ...
by irishcoffee on Wednesday August 17, 2016 @10:26AM
(#12304931)
You must be young. It's generally an after-dinner dessert drink.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9297990
Are you seriously expecting us to believe that your friend is telling you how the NSA is internally structured and how sensitive foreign operation intelligence programs work?
Plus in another comment of yours you claimed to know how General Atomics MQ-1C Gray Eagle worked behind the scenes but when asked to post more info you never did.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10954248
So you're seemingly a Linux admin, but know tons about the inner workings of both military contractors, the DoD, and NSA from your single friend? Seems uhh a stretch, let's just say that.