News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ripped off MS-DOS source. Parent comment

Re:There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ri... by dorkalorka on Monday August 15, 2016 @02:17PM (#12292300)
You just showed that the words "weak" and "emotional" mean two different things. No one ever questioned that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ri... by HeyLaughingBoy on Monday August 15, 2016 @02:47PM (#12292531)
The assumption in the post I replied to was that being emotional was seen essentially as being weak.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ri... by dragonwriter on Monday August 15, 2016 @04:07PM (#12293009)
No, the question was in what way one was more neutral than the other.

I mean, the whole post (excluding quoted material used to show what that post was responding to) was (including the incorrect use of a period where a question mark was intended):

How is the idea that women are "more emotional" than men "more neutral" than the idea that "women are weaker than men".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ri... by dorkalorka on Monday August 15, 2016 @03:18PM (#12292722)
No it wasn't. The question was whether one was more neutral than the other.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s a $200k reward for anyone who proves Microsoft ri... by sctb on Monday August 15, 2016 @04:26PM (#12293145)
Let's please not take this thread farther afield than it already is.
[ Parent | on HN ]