News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Return True to Win by plank on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:01AM (#12274878)
Took me a couple of tries... (Spoiler): Anyone anything shorter then 4 characters (two characters)?
Re:Return True to Win by lma21 on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:05AM (#12274897)
How did you solve the reflexive? I'm not getting at anything :(
Re:Return True to Win by kqr on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:12AM (#12274944)
NaN != NaN. It's how you're supposed to test for NaN, apparently.
Re:Return True to Win by madawan on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:34AM (#12275065)
Or use isNaN
Re:Return True to Win by kqr on Saturday August 13, 2016 @09:13AM (#12281334)
I'll give you one chance to guess how isNaN is implemented. https://github.com/v8/v8/blob/e6d1a80e790117dc27b20e9b14de4b...
Re:Return True to Win by TobbenTM on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:09AM (#12274923)
Yeah, tricky one. NaN works though. Because NaN == NaN = false
Re:Return True to Win by weisk on Friday August 12, 2016 @11:05AM (#12276270)
Another version, also 3 characters: 0/0
Re:Return True to Win by razorsese on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:17AM (#12274978)
Infinity - Infinity
Re:Return True to Win by kitfung on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:13AM (#12274956)
reflexive( function() {return ++window.x;}() )
Re:Return True to Win by posterboy on Friday August 12, 2016 @10:25AM (#12275889)
I don't think so
Re:Return True to Win by Zekio on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:07AM (#12274909)
I broke things to do it

[] - {}

Re:Return True to Win by Burgos on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:11AM (#12274935)
`NaN`
Re:Return True to Win by 0x4139 on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:10AM (#12274931)
!0 - 2 chars 1>0 - 3 chars
Re:Return True to Win by plank on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:02AM (#12274882)
Ah. 2 distinct characters now.
Re:Return True to Win by justinlardinois on Friday August 12, 2016 @07:55PM (#12279548)
I used !!1
Re:Return True to Win by bradleydwyer on Friday August 12, 2016 @08:09AM (#12274924)
Yup. !0