News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by gpderetta on Thursday August 11, 2016 @06:11PM (#12271995)
For the example if you are using kernel bypass of the network stack, which is increasingly common in high throughput/low latency applications.
Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by haimez on Thursday August 11, 2016 @10:03PM (#12273003)
If you're going to bypass the kernel network stack for performance, you're definitely not going to write the rest of your code in go. The garbage collector, goroutine scheduler, and conservative compile time optimizations will totally undermine the end goal.

If you're in that world, you're using C, C++, or That if you're feeling dangerous.

Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by pjmlp on Friday August 12, 2016 @03:02AM (#12273793)
The JVM is used a lot in Fintech.

Of course it isn't the OpenJDK, rather specialized JVMs like Azul or they code using C style coding with the GC out of the out paths, having profiled the applications with tools like Java Mission Control.

These are the customers driving Oracles effort for value types, AOT compilation and JNI replacement.

Why not just use C and C++, one might ask?

In spite of all these tricks and required knowledge, salaries are lower than for C and C++ developers and overall project costs are anyway lower due to shorter development times for the other tools not available in C and C++.

Hence why Fintech nowadays is looking into languages like Pony, because they don't want to wait for Java 10, if possible.

So an area where Rust might eventually earn some friends.

Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by kasey_junk on Thursday August 11, 2016 @11:01PM (#12273159)
I've done kernel bypass work on the JVM.
Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by gpderetta on Friday August 12, 2016 @09:37AM (#12275486)
FWIW, I wasn't thinking bout go.
Re:Zero-cost futures in Rust by saosebastiao on Thursday August 11, 2016 @07:23PM (#12272419)
Is anybody doing kernel bypass networking in go?