Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by dfsegoat on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @09:17AM
(#12254246)
The CIA did not exist in 1944. It was still OSS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Services
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by kylestlb on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @12:08PM
(#12255568)
That's mentioned in the article.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by theli0nheart on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @12:41PM
(#12255836)
It would be clearer if the title were changed.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by aklemm on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @01:13PM
(#12256099)
Not really since nobody knows what OSS is.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by theli0nheart on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @05:47PM
(#12257930)
So something factually incorrect is preferable? And is it not possible to simply expand the acronym? E.g.
"The Office of Strategic Services' 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)"
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)
by idrios on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @07:47PM
(#12258482)
From the article:
"Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions."
Are you a secret CIA saboteur?