News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015) by aklemm on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @01:13PM (#12256099)
Not really since nobody knows what OSS is.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015) by theli0nheart on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @05:47PM (#12257930)
So something factually incorrect is preferable? And is it not possible to simply expand the acronym? E.g.

"The Office of Strategic Services' 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015)"

Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015) by idrios on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @07:47PM (#12258482)
From the article:

"Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions."

Are you a secret CIA saboteur?

Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015) by pstuart on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @02:00PM (#12256500)
Open Source Software.
Re:The CIA’s 1944 Simple Sabotage Field Manual (2015) by blueblob on Tuesday August 09, 2016 @02:12PM (#12256609)
Open Sound System