Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it

Re:Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it by raiso-lo on Friday August 05, 2016 @08:37AM (#12231764)

We've been using https://rhodecode.com for internal repositories: it is also open source, yet has better interface and out-of-the-box LFS support.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it by mc42 on Friday August 05, 2016 @11:20AM (#12232971)

The native subversion and mercurial support for the same repos is incredibly attractive. Any idea how it converts them to a shared format in real-time?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it by raiso-lo on Friday August 05, 2016 @02:40PM (#12234807)

@mc42 They use a common layer called "VCS server". Here's how it looks like from the system architecture standpoint: https://docs.rhodecode.com/RhodeCode-Enterprise/admin/system...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it by mc42 on Friday August 05, 2016 @11:11PM (#12236849)

Thanks, that's really cool.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Moving to GitLab: Yes, it's worth it by atomi on Friday August 05, 2016 @02:52PM (#12234887)

Does it have repo mirroring? One of my favorite features of Gogs is the ability to mirror a remote repository with automatic updates.

[ Parent | on HN ]