You created a strawman argument (y'all want it to be 900gb!) and then counter it yourself with some reasonable suggestions that others here have made as well.
Re:Some news from LWN
by brazzledazzle on Thursday August 04, 2016 @01:28PM
(#12227110)
I don't think it's fair to accuse them of strawmanning. They did make it clear that they might be unfairly attributing the argument to the original commenter.
I don't know what the original commenter meant, but the text could be a bit bigger and the line lengths and spacing controlled.
The comment metadata could be shortened and humanized, though the audience may find it useful.
There's some bugs with the dropdowns on mobile (haven't been able to close one).
I don't know if that will get them subscriptions, but it'd make the site easier to read.
Ironically, if you look at the HTML classes, they are using a CSS library typically used to make "modern" sites many here revile: http://purecss.io/