News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The law depends on compute power by sliverstorm on Saturday July 30, 2016 @04:49PM (#12194642)
Didn't Sony try to claim a patent on the specific number, rather than some kind of security argument?
Re:The law depends on compute power by WildUtah on Sunday July 31, 2016 @02:46AM (#12196001)
Motorola has a patent—asserted in the Microsoft case—on a specific number used as an error correcting code.
Re:The law depends on compute power by lisper on Saturday July 30, 2016 @08:52PM (#12195270)
No. To patent something you have to disclose it, so patenting a secret key would totally defeat the purpose.
Re:The law depends on compute power by sliverstorm on Sunday July 31, 2016 @11:27PM (#12200040)
Well, I remember that being part of the contention. Sony said, "we've patented it". Everyone else said, "how can you have patented it, when you won't tell anyone what it is!?". Or something along those lines.
Re:The law depends on compute power by lisper on Monday August 01, 2016 @12:11AM (#12200154)
If you can find the patent number that would make it easier to formulate a cogent response.
Re:The law depends on compute power by sliverstorm on Monday August 01, 2016 @12:15AM (#12200161)
Some googling suggests it was not a patent they claimed, but that it was an "illegal number". Very possible I confused the two.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

I think at the time what I found ridiculous was that you were prohibited from "having" the number, but of course nobody could say what number it was you weren't allowed to have... seemed like something that belonged in Dr. Strangelove.