News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some Users Want Terrible User Interfaces by og1 on Thursday March 25, 2010 @12:21PM (#1218720)
I don't know if I can agree with the stick shift argument. There are benefits over an automatic transmission, and you can choose the same model of car with either transmission types. I'd equate the differences to having a settings page with defaults and then advanced user options. I like a better design than not, but I think the traders use bloomberg terminal largely for the data that it displays. I don't think that is is going to change much between the current and potentially redesigned versions.
Re:Some Users Want Terrible User Interfaces by rbranson on Thursday March 25, 2010 @12:27PM (#1218734)
Agreed. As far as I'm concerned, a manual transmission and an automatic transmission are completely different animals altogether. In my mind, his whole argument fell thru once the statement was made. It's like comparing a text-based shell with a GUI interface. There are trade-offs to be considered and neither of them are "better" than the other, they just have different strengths and weaknesses.
Re:Some Users Want Terrible User Interfaces by Shorel on Thursday March 25, 2010 @03:07PM (#1219202)
Manual transmissions can save lives for users that know how to drive well.

They are also a lot more efficient in mountains and other difficult terrains.

Re:Some Users Want Terrible User Interfaces by thyrsus on Thursday March 25, 2010 @06:46PM (#1219756)
Since my transmission is stick shift, I'm not worried about Toyota floor mats, accelerator or brake pedals, or software bugs. I've never had a problem, and I would reflexively respond in a safe way were something to occur.
Re:Some Users Want Terrible User Interfaces by Qz on Thursday March 25, 2010 @01:00PM (#1218835)
I think they're right that some users do want terrible interfaces, but yes their examples are terrible and non-representative.