News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Book Piracy as Peer Preservation by icebraining on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @01:03PM (#12167095)
either you have a free economy, in which case you make every damn thing free, or you accept that rules of ownership are necessary and that the output of labour has value independent of the ease with which it can be copied.

Rules of ownership are necessary for rivalrous goods, and not for others. Citing Thomas Jefferson,

"He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper [(candle)] at mine, receives light without darkening me.

That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation."

Re:Book Piracy as Peer Preservation by clock_tower on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @01:50PM (#12167450)
Jefferson's talking about memetics -- about the spread of ideas and ways of thinking. I don't see how IP law interferes with meme competition; and I don't see how meme competition justifies pirating entertainment (which requires large investments in visuals, audio, acting or voice-acting, computer programming, and so on, all of which the spread of ideas doesn't need).
Re:Book Piracy as Peer Preservation by icebraining on Tuesday July 26, 2016 @03:35PM (#12168212)
The argument he used works for any non-rivalrous good, even if his specific concern at the time was with memetics.