News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Humans once opposed coffee and refrigeration: why we ofte... by maxerickson on Monday July 25, 2016 @04:26PM (#12161372)
Just make the entity that plants the IP responsible for replacing any seed it contaminates.

That doesn't protect against global seed contamination, but we aren't teetering on that precipice.

Re:Humans once opposed coffee and refrigeration: why we ofte... by astrodust on Monday July 25, 2016 @04:39PM (#12161454)
The problem with the "teetering" moment is these things have a way of sneaking up on you. Exponential growth in GMO crops would push this from an "in fifty years" thing to "in ten years" which is basically tomorrow.

I also doubt Monsanto and other big GMO organizations are going to give away anything ever unless they're forced to. Their answer to everything is "sue me" because they know they'll bury you.

Re:Humans once opposed coffee and refrigeration: why we ofte... by maxerickson on Monday July 25, 2016 @04:46PM (#12161504)
I'm basically proposing a principle that could be cast into law. Plant a crop with IP attached to it, then you better clean up after yourself. Monsanto would probably lobby against such a law, but so what, screw them and pass it anyway.

I'm pretty sanguine about the teetering. Among other things, companies like Monsanto (and thus their competitors) like to do things like maintain big seed banks. So do academics and hobbyists.