News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lazy GNU make variables by FiloSottile on Saturday July 23, 2016 @09:25PM (#12151784)
So, a couple days ago I shared a Makefile with John, meant to become the standard Go project Makefile at CloudFlare. Here are the comments:

> John: This is very expensive. Can't it be calculated once (:=)?

> Me: The problem is that we don't want to calculate it if we don't need it, because we might run make before go is installed, and that would fail.

> John: http://blog.jgc.org/2016/07/lazy-gnu-make-variables.html

I think he wrote this piece to answer my question.

That's working with great people right there.

Re:Lazy GNU make variables by chubot on Sunday July 24, 2016 @01:59AM (#12152380)
Well, it was nice of him to send you a blog link, rather than telling you to buy his book, which mentions this exact trick :)

https://www.nostarch.com/gnumake

Re:Lazy GNU make variables by jgrahamc on Sunday July 24, 2016 @03:37AM (#12152626)
Many of the things in my book are on line in different places. The technique I use in the book is here: https://www.cmcrossroads.com/article/makefile-optimization-e... It uses a different technique and requires replacing $(FOO) with $(call cache,FOO) everywhere.

The book comprises everything I've written about GNU make edited, rechecked and cleaned up with additions to cover new GNU make features and a couple of other things I hadn't written before.

Re:Lazy GNU make variables by dknecht on Wednesday July 27, 2016 @07:39PM (#12177339)
If you start asking him too many questions he does eventually just throw the book at you (albeit a free autographed copy).
Re:Lazy GNU make variables by jgrahamc on Sunday July 24, 2016 @03:41AM (#12152631)
Yes, that's what happened. I was thinking about your response and left it in my inbox to respond to. Figured I'd write something up for public consumption instead and as I'd done it differently in my book figured a blog post was appropriate.