Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site

Re:Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site by mamon on Saturday July 23, 2016 @06:07AM (#12148997)

Wikileaks itself is no angel. Have you ever wondered how they get the information they publish? The simple and most probable answer is: Julian Assagne is a Russian agent, working with GRU. That's also the reason why he helped Snowden get assylium in Russia after the whole NSA surveilance thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site by appleflaxen on Saturday July 23, 2016 @08:53AM (#12149335)

All you have are allegations.

All Assange has is evidence (in the form of leaked documents)

Even if he were a proven state agent, I am happy to have information about how my representatives are working against my interests in a systematic way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site by kushti on Saturday July 23, 2016 @08:13AM (#12149245)

Any proofs you can provide links to?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site by mamon on Saturday July 23, 2016 @08:47AM (#12149324)

I based my claims mostly on this:

https://20committee.com/2015/08/31/wikileaks-is-a-front-for-...

https://20committee.com/2013/07/06/wikileaks-snowden-and-the...

As a former counteritelligence officer this guy seems to know what he's talking about. Unless of course he has his own agenda, but the facts presented are verifiable and pretty convincing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site by appleflaxen on Saturday July 23, 2016 @02:21PM (#12150432)

Which means, at worst, that the ad homonym attacks are factually correct.

They are still irrelevant.

[ Parent | on HN ]