Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by dsacco on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @08:23PM
(#12133642)
You just described what.cd.
What.cd open sourced Gazelle, the source code for the website and tracker. The core development team accepts pull requests, but they are themselves insulated from the owner and operator of what.cd.
Since opening Gazelle, many other private trackers have adopted it.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by ac29 on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @08:52PM
(#12133767)
Yes, the code is open, but the state of the what.cd tracker and website is not. If they were taken down, the service would cease to exist.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by SSLy on Thursday July 21, 2016 @02:02AM
(#12135059)
I doubt. In the recent thread linked on the homepage you can read they have quite contingency measures in place. If some government seized all production wcd servers tomorrow, I believe it would be running back after a few days.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by mburns on Thursday July 21, 2016 @01:57AM
(#12135043)
Things like IPFS[0] address this problem.
[0] https://ipfs.io/
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by eevilspock on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @09:23PM
(#12133906)
A distributed blockchain sounds right. Now imagine that "mining" for this blockhchain is serving torrents, and you have to spend currency to download. The currency can be sold for monetary currency (e.g. dollars or bitcoin), so leechers could pay seeders.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by Dylan16807 on Thursday July 21, 2016 @02:42AM
(#12135176)
What problem are you trying to solve? Downloading torrents works fine. The weak link is the search engine and description-host.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by posterboy on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @11:26PM
(#12134428)
and soon you'd have monopolies seeding and the whole decentralization fades.
Re:Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distributio...
by mrep on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @08:11PM
(#12133584)
I think you just discovered the first actual use case for ethereum. Albeit, the architecture would have to be a little different and there's a lot of complications in that.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if ethereum came to be a way to host illegal websites considering bitcoins main market is for illegal transactions.
For example, you could operate (your instance of) your pseudo-legal service yourself, but open-source the codebase (sticking it on GitHub even) and accept patches from anyone.
You could also implement a simple replication architecture for your service, where at any time one node (yours) is considered to be the 'canonical master', and then other nodes can join the network as slaves, receive replicated state, and run as mirrors. Sort of like Linux package repository mirrors.
With such a setup, arresting the original maintainer just means 1. a codebase fork by a new maintainer, and 2. a (probably manual) network master-node election.
And that's just a setup that lets you stay in complete control without having to trust anybody (since you still "own" the codebase, and the master node, until you disappear.) If you are willing to relinquish control to the system itself, you could just build your service on a DHT or a signed store-and-forward hierarchy or a blockchain or whatever. There's no reason that things that are essentially "a BitTorrent tracker exposed through a website" need to have their canonical state anywhere at all.