News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by flukus on Tuesday July 19, 2016 @10:49PM (#12126536)
> I'd love to agree. But with IRC you've no guarantee, for instance, that an offline user will receive notifications when they sign in (plus multi client handling). > Slack has search for history, which is huge. No more "eh we talked about it".

For functionality like that it sounds like a mailing list would fit the use case better.

> Onprem is great. But it's a hindrance for quick adoption.

It's not either/or. Think of git, you can use a hosted server or a private one. The ability to host your own server doesn't hinder anyone.

Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by orbitur on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @12:54AM (#12126980)
> For functionality like that it sounds like a mailing list would fit the use case better.

Then you're looking at an email with the visual noise of recipients and whitespace and signatures, and if the UI is really bad (mailing list websites, for example), every message is viewed in isolation without the responses.

Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by cjk101010 on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @09:10AM (#12128733)
The problem is: we're removing features one by one which help dealing with mailing lists. Most modern mail agents e.g. miss the threading feature, IMHO totally a must-have for mailing lists. Things don't get better, they get, in an attempt to over-simplify email, worse.
Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by flukus on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @03:16AM (#12127367)
I totally agree on the UI disaster that a lot of those mailing lists are. But it seems like the solution to that would be a better mailing list ui, not to throw the whole lot out and start from scratch.
Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by orbitur on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @01:47PM (#12130949)
I don't know how we'd find a nice, automated solution to removing people's wordy signatures.
Re:Open Letter to the Emacs Maintainers by flukus on Wednesday July 20, 2016 @07:37PM (#12133415)
Doesn't gmail handle this really well? It doesn't change often, so it should be too hard to build a filter.