Re:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty (2010)
by eropple on Sunday July 17, 2016 @12:27PM
(#12110667)
What you're describing as "fluff", most people describe as "long-form writing." If you're reading purely for brrt-brrt-clank-insert-information-into-meatbot-head, you're missing out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty (2010)
by dorfsmay on Sunday July 17, 2016 @12:37PM
(#12110711)
Different learning styles and purposes. Even people I know who enjoy descriptive detailed writing when reading a novel like to-the-point list of facts/arguments when reading news and essays.
Re:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty (2010)
by jedmeyers on Sunday July 17, 2016 @12:40PM
(#12110721)
Others might also describe it as "getting paid by the word count".
Re:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty (2010)
by rhizome on Sunday July 17, 2016 @02:57PM
(#12111263)
You're high if you think that The Atlantic is some Demand Media/About.com/wikihow content spoo.
Re:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Ending Poverty (2010)
by tomjen3 on Sunday July 17, 2016 @01:45PM
(#12110958)
With few exceptions the long-form articles posted here are all normal articles padded with bullshit, not very in-depth articles. I wouldn't want to read them either.