News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spy or whistleblower? Should Obama settle with Snowden? by pdkl95 on Saturday July 16, 2016 @09:17PM (#12108577)
This isn't about a defense. The problem is that those "select few" are supposed to be subject to the same laws as the rest of us.

When we see clear evidence that "rule of law" no longer applies, why should anybody respect the law?

Re:Spy or whistleblower? Should Obama settle with Snowden? by themartorana on Saturday July 16, 2016 @09:29PM (#12108622)
True. Petraeus and Clapper pretty much sealed that deal. I mean, we already knew those with money and power were treated differently, it just happened in the dark, usually.

The financial collapse, Clapper lying to Congress, and the Petraeus scandal (and subsequent zero punishment for any of the three) made it clear public knowledge and brought it out of the shadows into the light of day.

Re:Spy or whistleblower? Should Obama settle with Snowden? by hiram112 on Sunday July 17, 2016 @12:04AM (#12108985)
Petraeus received a $100k fine. Not a huge deal for someone who made a lot more on his biography, which was the cause of the issue, but still not zero punishment.