Re:CloudFlare, We Have a Problem
by reefoctopus on Saturday July 16, 2016 @01:54AM
(#12105395)
How about because they serve hundred of terabytes of our images for $20/month? It has been well worth the money.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I am talking about free users.
They'll serve quite a lot of traffic for those as well. I've seen quite a few people recommend a combination of Amazon S3 and Cloudfront for hosting static sites.
Cloudfront is AWS's CDN, and isn't related to CloudFlare.
Typo. meant Cloudflare.
Re:CloudFlare, We Have a Problem
by angry-hacker on Saturday July 16, 2016 @11:36AM
(#12106679)
The same applies to free tier, I need 5x less server power thanks to cloudflare and I get it for free! Including other useful things.