Re:Tesla confirms “Autopilot” crash in Montana
by taejo on Wednesday July 13, 2016 @02:47AM
(#12084318)
In some countries it's illegal to swerve to avoid an animal. I assume this means that they've judged it safer not to swerve.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla confirms “Autopilot” crash in Montana
by pluma on Wednesday July 13, 2016 @04:57AM
(#12084869)
Technically the swerving itself is not necessarily illegal, but it makes you liable for anything that could have been avoided by not swerving. If you swerve on a free and open road and don't cause any damage or injury to anything or anyone (including yourself and your car), it's not like you will still be dragged to court just because you didn't want to unnecessarily run over someone's pet.
Re:Tesla confirms “Autopilot” crash in Montana
by qbrass on Wednesday July 13, 2016 @02:59AM
(#12084362)
It usually means if you swerve and cause an accident, it's your fault and you can't blame it on the animal jumping out in front of you.
Re:Tesla confirms “Autopilot” crash in Montana
by Too on Saturday July 16, 2016 @03:57AM
(#12105639)
Probably because it would be impossible to prove that there was an animal there at that time.
Re:Tesla confirms “Autopilot” crash in Montana
by brokenmachine on Tuesday July 19, 2016 @10:10PM
(#12126401)
Many cars have dashcams now, especially Teslas.
But definitely the law could, and probably is, out of touch.