News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Literature in Castro’s Cuba by pavlov on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @09:59PM (#12083489)
Would you find it reasonable for someone to express admiration for Napoleon or Julius Caesar? Both were genocidal narcissists, but also brilliant military strategists and orators.

It's possible to admire the latter aspects in isolation, without condoning most of what they did. I feel the same way about Castro's revolutionary campaign.

(Let's leave Hitler out of online forum conversations for everyone's sake...)

Re:Literature in Castro’s Cuba by wildmusings on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @10:47PM (#12083620)
>Well, the Internet became just that medium, but Castro never deemed fit to give access to the citizens of his country. He and his comrades are just too old to get it.

I think this quote from your original post better shows the profound misconceptions that you have about the Castro regime.

The internet is not tightly restricted because the "he and his comrades are just too old to get it". It's restricted because the free exchange of ideas and facts is a threat to their brutal dictatorship. Because all of their heads would probably roll if it ever collapses.

Napoleon and Caesar are now academic history. They are not combatants in any ongoing conflicts, nor causing any ongoing suffering. The Castros, meanwhile, are still exporting their "revolution" to other places (Venezuela is a very visible victim) and those who suffer greatly at their hands are still with us.

Re:Literature in Castro’s Cuba by x2398dh1 on Wednesday July 13, 2016 @09:26AM (#12085935)
No, let's not leave Hitler out. Do you also admire Hitler? Why or why not?