News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Conjoined Triangles of Senior-Level Development. Parent comment

Re:The Conjoined Triangles of Senior-Level Development by ap22213 on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @11:23AM (#12079773)
Honestly, it's difficult to back things with evidence in this field. Ever try to get someone to read a paper on software engineering methods? Before one can get them to understand the evidence or even look at the data, they've already whipped together another couple thousand lines of code to demonstrate the opposite.

Look, I'm definitely not a top %1 (or even %10) architect. But, I have had enough successes under my belt that it's statistically improbable that I don't know what I'm talking about. However, my experience is usually discounted because 'times change, and old ideas aren't relevant' as they say.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Conjoined Triangles of Senior-Level Development by hackits on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @11:37AM (#12079923)
`Ever try to get someone to read a paper on software engineering methods?`

Yup, they never read it, let alone care.

`Look, I'm definitely not a top %1 (or even %10) architect`

I would say just simply knowing puts you in the top 10%. I don't wanted to come off as a jackass. Mostly because I've been through the same thing.

I make my bread and butter maintain large government software. Some of it good, some of it bad.

[ Parent | on HN ]