News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The axle count of trains in Switzerland must not be a mul... by imtringued on Monday July 11, 2016 @12:44PM (#12072282)
Is there any reason why those 8 locomotives have to form a single train? Can't they just have 8 seperate trains?
Re:The axle count of trains in Switzerland must not be a mul... by Symbiote on Monday July 11, 2016 @01:13PM (#12072558)
A single train only needs one driver, not eight.

Eight trains would need a gap between them ­— typically several km per train — so the capacity of the line is increased by having longer trains.

Air resistance would be higher for eight trains.

Re:The axle count of trains in Switzerland must not be a mul... by Viper007Bond on Monday July 11, 2016 @01:14PM (#12072563)
Those 8 locomotives can be controlled by a single team of people. Additionally it allows greater freight throughput because you need to maintain minimum distances between trains. It's actually extremely uncommon where I live to see a train with a single locomotive.
Re:The axle count of trains in Switzerland must not be a mul... by masklinn on Monday July 11, 2016 @02:06PM (#12072985)
Well technically that specific train was a stunt (at the time BHP Billiton's regular run used 336 cars and 6~8 locomotives, now 264 cars and 4 locomotives), other commenters have answered as to why you'd want to run longer trains (and AFAIK modern trains rarely run a single locomotive these days, a pair is just more efficient and convenient even on passenger trains)

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_power for more information on running distributed power.

Re:The axle count of trains in Switzerland must not be a mul... by pm24601 on Monday July 11, 2016 @04:14PM (#12074078)
Not to mention, if a loco had a failure the second loco would get the train off the main or to a convenient yard swapping out the failed locomotive.