Another interpretation of finding that people we perceive as noble turn out to have flaws might be that noble people are people, and people have flaws. If anything, being flawless would actually take away from their success since they wouldn't be dealing with the same crap as the rest of us.

Einstein appears to have been a big-time philanderer, for example. Doesn't detract from his contributions to our society in my view.

People who think philandering is a flaw are not as enlightened as Einstein was.

Yeah, like his wives. Stupid wives.

Guess I pity his wife then, being both unenlightened and cheated on.

>I believe a lot of people we now see as noble were just the right person in the right place at the right time, and the more we dig in today, in hindsight, the easier to see their personal flaws.

Noble or not, people have flaws.

What's important about them isn't their flaws (which millions share) but their unique insights (which millions don't share).

Well, I can always flaunt some unique flaws.

I think in the article he himself described why he had a different point of view. He was indeed an outsider. His mind was not shaped by past generations, because there were no slaves and thus very few black people in Germany.

Regarding his personal life, Einstein wasn't the most devoted lover to his wives/lovers etc. Not everyone (including me) counts that as a moral failing but some do.

Isn't it usually said that Einstein betrayed his wife? That's pretty horrible to me, no matter how "right" (in your opinion and mine) he was about other things.

You can be right about some things and wrong about others. Being in the wrong once doesn't make you a bad person. It just means you're one of us.