Re:Facebook Messenger begins testing end-to-end encryption u...
by justratsinacoat on Friday July 08, 2016 @10:31AM
(#12055768)
>> It looks as if PGP's days are numbered
Comments like this are inevitable and represent Facebook's attempts to induce us to route all of our communications though its platform. For the quoted commenter, it's probably too late.
Re:Facebook Messenger begins testing end-to-end encryption u...
by _yp on Friday July 08, 2016 @06:23PM
(#12059021)
PGP has failed to provide "encryption for the masses".
Re:Facebook Messenger begins testing end-to-end encryption u...
by cyphar on Saturday July 09, 2016 @09:33AM
(#12061250)
PGP fills a niche that OTR and Axolotl do not. It provides a bunch of operations that are not supported by OTR (anything that requires signatures that are verifiable by third parties). PGP is used by the masses (package signatures and similar functions), it's just that they don't use PGP for communication.
Re:Facebook Messenger begins testing end-to-end encryption u...
by eyeareque on Friday July 08, 2016 @10:21PM
(#12059778)
PGP while a decent technology is very cumbersome. Worse, it's easy to shoot yourself in the foot if you aren't an advanced level user. I've used it for years on a regular basis with various implementations. It's just never been user friendly or easy to use. If it was more user friendly it might have had better adoption rates. As moxie has pointed out, we need something better for the masses, it looks like we are finally seeing progress towards that goal now.
This seems gratuitously hostile (and, even worse, is irrelevant). PGP is a very useful piece of software, and it does something completely different from Signal, and I'm glad both exist.