News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LokiJS – In-memory JavaScript Datastore with Persistence by ldehaan on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @03:24PM (#12038858)
I used this on a internal project for a little while, it's easy to use, and the promises integration is useful, however at high volumes it did very poorly.

I was storing time series data.

I ended up moving to redis which has worked very well as long as I make sure it has enough memory for the date range I am keeping.

I hope this project keeps at it and gets a handle on performance under heavy load.

Re:LokiJS – In-memory JavaScript Datastore with Persistence by joeminichino on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @03:54PM (#12039060)
hey @ldehaan i'd love to hear more about the shortcomings of Loki, i never had a real-life need for really high volumes so I would greatly appreciate some insights in order to improve it.