Re:LokiJS – In-memory JavaScript Datastore with Persistence
by joeminichino on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @03:54PM
(#12039060)
hey @ldehaan i'd love to hear more about the shortcomings of Loki, i never had a real-life need for really high volumes so I would greatly appreciate some insights in order to improve it.
I was storing time series data.
I ended up moving to redis which has worked very well as long as I make sure it has enough memory for the date range I am keeping.
I hope this project keeps at it and gets a handle on performance under heavy load.