Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by lbn on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @02:58PM
(#12038711)
> You can still do remote work from a cheap location
Wouldn't the employer insist on paying in the local salary range?
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by mathgeek on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @04:20PM
(#12039261)
In my experience, this is not the case.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by rhizome on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @03:36PM
(#12038934)
You can still do remote work from a cheap location, or stay and have FU money.
Do they have good schools in $cheap_location?
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by Retric on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @04:08PM
(#12039160)
There are a very large number of cheap locations with good schools. Especially when you include private schools.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by mathgeek on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @04:20PM
(#12039265)
Private schools tend to increase the "cheap" part quite a bit.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by Retric on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @04:56PM
(#12039488)
Depends on # of kids. Many great schools are well under 10k/year, but that's only so useful if you have 5 kids.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by nommm-nommm on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @05:46PM
(#12039768)
9k a year is not cheap.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by Retric on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @07:34PM
(#12040258)
Sure, though that only starts after pre-k and k, which tends to be much cheaper.
Anyway, if you compare starting a family with ~1M in the bank and 1 income at 50k vs. dual income 220k in the valley and no savings outside of home equity there are benefits on both sides.
Re:Who pays when startup employees keep their equity?
by mathgeek on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @01:04AM
(#12041310)
> starting a family with ~1M in the bank
This is an outlier and, in my opinion, not representative of any useful demographic for this discussion. The idea that you bank $100k a year (let's even through in compounding) is certainly feasible, but not common.
Giving up 500k in salary for a chance to make 500k in stock is a terrible bet. Alternatively, only save up 100k in 10 years, go to Vegas and bet it all at slightly negative odds. You can set things up for a 20% chance of getting ~500k which is better odds than many startups while still having more day to day money.