News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re-reading Kahneman's “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by jldugger on Monday July 04, 2016 @01:36PM (#12031978)
It's a science book; the standards of evidence are lower and often rely upon credentials. If you want rigorous science, go to the peer reviewed literature: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=kahneman&btnG=&as...

Note that Kahneman is a psychologist, though he is affiliated with behaviorial economics.

Re:Re-reading Kahneman's “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by internaut on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @07:38AM (#12035699)
I read affiliated as afflicted. This sometimes happens to me. It's like Freudian slips for your mind.
Re:Re-reading Kahneman's “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Retric on Monday July 04, 2016 @06:43PM (#12033398)
I don't think it quite met even that low standard.