News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by CM30 on Sunday July 03, 2016 @06:42PM (#12027968)
Which seems to present the interesting divide between European software engineers and American ones.

In the US, you get pampered, but seem to have lots of late nights, 'crunch' time, etc. In Europe, you get far lower wages but it's treated almost solely as a 9-5 job.

Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by sotojuan on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:03PM (#12028029)
A lot (maybe most) programming jobs in the US are 9-5 but they're not at companies or places HN would be interested in discussing.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by deskamess on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:06PM (#12028041)
Unfortunately there are a lot of jobs in North America that are stated as 9-5 but include unpaid on-call and overtime. There are laws that make it so that IT does not have to be paid overtime.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by kemiller2002 on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:15PM (#12028069)
I have to disagree with this. Most IT jobs in the U.S. aren't 9-5. Every place I've interviewed have always hinted at the fact that it's not a 40 hour a week job. This may sound jaded, but companies really do expect to get more than what they pay for, and it's not just the silicon valley ones. I think the real issue is that most programmers feel a dedication and passion to what they do and they want to see the project succeed, and so the get taken advantage of.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by copperx on Sunday July 03, 2016 @08:03PM (#12028201)
It's ridiculous to frame it like that. I'm sure most surgeons also want to make sure their patients benefit from a surgery, but I'm sure they don't get taken advantage of.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by deskamess on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:09PM (#12028055)
I read those stories and wondered when they got time to be 'pampered'.

For the jobs listed, if they averaged out the compensation/hours-worked it would be interesting to see what the numbers are (with and without RSU).

Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by 1888franklin on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:39PM (#12028139)
The "dark side" described here is programmers not using our labor power for the right things, not really a downside to having labor power. Instead of being seduced by fancy campuses, we can insist on better working conditions. I work 15 hours/week, mostly on my own schedule, with low pressure. My free time is more important to me than a six figure salary, living in the valley, or free lunch.

Generally speaking, programmers in the US have the labor power to shape how we work. But many of us buy into a certain idea of what success means and how to get there. Really no one to blame but ourselves on that count.

Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by ZeroFries on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:41PM (#12028144)
I would love to do this at some point. May I ask how you managed to get a 15 h/w job?
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by cityzen on Sunday July 03, 2016 @11:21PM (#12028747)
I don't think (s)he has a 15 h/w job, they just work 15 hours per week. When you work for yourself you can do this. It takes some time to figure out what works but 15 h/w at $100/hr is ~$6,000/month.

If you do good work and find clients that are willing to work on retainer, it's not that hard. Lots of companies are willing to pay a decent amount to keep someone around that is responsible and does good work.

Also, if you work for yourself, you have to check the salary mentality at the door. You have to start with, "what do i need to make per month to live comfortably" instead of, "Developers usually make $100k a year, so I need to make that".

Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by 1888franklin on Monday July 04, 2016 @03:41PM (#12032587)
Found a small agency that is oriented towards remote and flexible work. Offered to join w/ the expectation of 15/week. Started as a contractor for them, then switched to hourly employee once it was clear we were a good fit.

At my prior job, I was offered full time. I responded by proposing 35/wk, with a proportional salary reduction. At the next compensation/review meeting, I successfully asked to reduce to 32/wk (same pay).

Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by J_Darnley on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:56PM (#12028182)
He is a Linus Torvald, a John Carmack, or a Chris Sawyer. He has the skills, the experience, and the name to demand that.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by copperx on Sunday July 03, 2016 @07:59PM (#12028194)
I'm intrigued now. Who is this 1888franklin?
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by J_Darnley on Sunday July 03, 2016 @08:05PM (#12028207)
Honestly, I have no idea. However, that is the kind of person he would need to be to get a 3 hour a day programming job. Or he is full of shit and talking out of his ass but that would be uncivil so I better not say that.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by Mandatum on Sunday July 03, 2016 @08:42PM (#12028338)
Or he's a programmer with a respectable hourly rate (100+) and only works a few days a week remotely who lives in a cheap area. Any decent programmer can attain this.
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by 1888franklin on Monday July 04, 2016 @03:43PM (#12032596)
lol nothing like that
Re:Dark side of pampered software engineer by nikdaheratik on Monday July 04, 2016 @01:47AM (#12029061)
It's kind of strange for them to use the word "pampered" when a large number of the perks are basically ways for the company to justify using more of the employees "free" time by taking care of many of the day-to-day practicalities that could take them off-site, like laundry and cooking, or exercise and getting a professional to work those neck muscles to reduce the stiffness from working at a computer for 10+ hour days. I'm sure if some of them could hire a lower wage worker to sleep for them, they'd probably do that too.

I don't envy the SV crowd much, but many of the perks are about maximising the amount of time the employees can work over most other considerations. And looked at through that lens, very few of the "perks" a really much in the way of pampering.