News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by simianstyle on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @09:15PM (#120172)
I love frameworks, but using one for CSS seems a bit too much for me. I like the idea of having only code that is needed for my site design.
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by immad on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @10:12PM (#120194)
I just can't get into css. I would much prefer to use this framework than have to think about it... But maybe thats just me
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by kajecounterhack on Thursday February 21, 2008 @05:38AM (#120346)
The only reason I got into it was http://www.csszengarden.com

Knowing that you can change a layout in that many ways just using CSS...its quite humbling.

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by tim2 on Thursday February 21, 2008 @10:57AM (#120485)
I've found programmable templating frameworks to be more powerful and maintainable than 100% css.

Looking at what a lot of those zengarden designs do behind the scenes shows you just how ugly css can be.

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by mattmaroon on Thursday February 21, 2008 @04:48PM (#120745)
It's pretty great for that. It allows you to do complex layouts a little faster while keeping them readable. I'll be using it for any future sites I design.
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by DocSavage on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @03:42PM (#119974)
How anyone here compared BlueprintCSS to YUI CSS foundation?

In an interview linked from the wiki, the creator said: "The first CSS framework I checked out was the Yahoo User Interface Library, but found it to be way too bloated for what I want from a designers framework."

Here's an interesting response: http://foohack.com/2007/08/blueprint-css-framework-vs-yui-gr...

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by wavesplash on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @04:47PM (#120024)
YUI css is designed to do a few layouts well and make other layouts possible. Its not bad, but it is clunky to work with and a pain if you don't fit one of its proportional models precisely.

Blueprint is more logical and conceptually easier to understand - everything is put on a flexible grid and you choose how many grid units you want to use for each layout block.

I dig the rest of the YUI toolkit, but compared to blueprint, YUI CSS feels like a hack.

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by pius on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @06:55PM (#120106)
Blueprint was a snap for me to pick up and the markup looks good (concerns about mixing style and semantics notwithstanding).

As for the YUI CSS libraries, well, my eyes crossed a little when I looked at the markup. I only checked YUI CSS out briefly, though.

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by pius on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @03:54PM (#119981)
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by andr on Thursday February 21, 2008 @09:47AM (#120433)
isn't the idea of CSS to separate design from semantic content? putting <div snap="span-10"> (spans 10 grid columns) in your HTML entirely defeats the purpose.
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by utnick on Thursday February 21, 2008 @09:52AM (#120439)
i just read a blog post taking the other side of this argument:

http://jeffcroft.com/blog/2007/aug/09/myth-content-and-prese...

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by andr on Thursday February 21, 2008 @12:30PM (#120541)
what about print css, phones, etc, etc.? what about using html as a data feed (e.g., for your JS, microformats, etc.)? BluePrint is clearly written by and for designers, rather than IAs.
Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by musiciangames on Thursday February 21, 2008 @05:41AM (#120348)
http://files.bjorkoy.com/blueprint/tests/sample.html "This box is aligned with the sidebar"

Not on my screen, unfortunately. (Firefox 2, Ubuntu, 1280x1024)

Re:Awesome BlueprintCSS framework hits 0.7 by jsg on Wednesday February 20, 2008 @10:34PM (#120205)
hmm...samples don't look quite right in safari (left margin disappears)