WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by zx2c4 on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @11:42AM (#11994633)

We'll actually be producing a Rust implementation for userspace. It'd be interesting to see that work ported back to kernelspace. Cool suggestions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by nickpsecurity on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @11:45AM (#11994672)

That sounds good. What's its current implementation language?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by tptacek on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @03:18PM (#11996674)

It's Linux kernel resident. It's C code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by nickpsecurity on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @03:45PM (#11996906)

Wow. Talk about overlooking the obvious. Thanks lol...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by viraptor on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:30PM (#11998677)

Maybe most likely, but not necessarily obvious. While there's no popular module for kernel written in something else than C (as far as I know), there are known ways to write working non-C modules.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN by nickpsecurity on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @05:28AM (#12000435)

C was best assumption as 99+% chance it would be C. Yet, you are right in that I've seen device drivers for Linux done in Ada and ATS languages. It's why I usually don't assume but one was warranter here.

[ Parent | on HN ]