News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Cities by superuser2 on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:23PM (#11988247)
Is this Manhattan?

Because in Chicago I think that describes about 10 blocks (a few hundred staggeringly wealthy people in the most lavish of luxury condo towers). The rest of us have some tiny, price-gouging convenience stores nearby but have to go ~20 blocks for a real supermarket, 4-5 miles to downtown for a Target or Macy's. Taking the train is less of a hassle than parking in the Loop, but it's still a hassle.

Re:New Cities by ido on Monday June 27, 2016 @04:11PM (#11989088)
In Vienna "maximum 5-10 minutes walk from the closest supermarket" would cover virtually the entire population.
Re:New Cities by jbattle on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:39PM (#11988389)
I lived in three different apartments in uptown and edgewater and was able to walk to a supermarket within a half-mile. Two of the locations were also close to other general shopping choices. All three were close enough to the El to get us whereever else we wanted to go. Downtown Evanston is similar or maybe even better. I get your point that this model is not common in the US - but I believe that's the entire point of this article - how can cities be designed to be more livable?
Re:New Cities by ginko on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:34PM (#11988346)
It's Trondheim.
Re:New Cities by cozzyd on Monday June 27, 2016 @07:58PM (#11990482)
?? This wasn't true in Hyde Park and it certainly isn't true in South Loop.