News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WeChat Impact Report 2016 – latest data about Chinese soc... by nadu on Monday June 27, 2016 @05:53AM (#11985107)
It says 67% of users used WeChat to make payments of atleast 100RMB a month. That's a significant number! I guess WeChat makes a commission on that payment. Would that be the largest moneymaking feature of WeChat?
Re:WeChat Impact Report 2016 – latest data about Chinese soc... by roylez on Monday June 27, 2016 @06:41AM (#11985289)
I will never activate my wechat payment. Actually I avoid all Tencent products like plague. Having been seeing Tencent's shameless copy-cating and alluring teenager to spend money on its shitty virtual costumes (In early days, you would have a half naked virtual avatar if you didn't purchase any costumes and costumes have expirations),it is hard for me to regain any trust in this company.
Re:WeChat Impact Report 2016 – latest data about Chinese soc... by kercker on Monday June 27, 2016 @06:08AM (#11985162)
WeChat users can send Red Envelope to friends or relatives. It is often used as a game in a WeChat group. I dont think this can be counted as real payment.
Re:WeChat Impact Report 2016 – latest data about Chinese soc... by dilemma on Monday June 27, 2016 @06:27AM (#11985239)
I order lunch on WeChat and send a red envelope inside a group chat as payment after its been delivered. The group has 300+ members. This is the exception, though. There are better ways of making payments through WeChat and I'm guessing that envelopes make up a small fraction of the stated number.
Re:WeChat Impact Report 2016 – latest data about Chinese soc... by seanmcdirmid on Monday June 27, 2016 @09:19AM (#11985956)
Is it really that weird? My wife uses weixin for normal things like buying lunch, paying for a taxi, buying veggies at the stand downstairs. It would add up to more than 100 rmb/ month, but then so would a UnionPay card, and Tencent is subsidizing the heck out of this right now to get adoption up.

QR is a lot less convenient than RF, ApplePay this is not.