Re:Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
by cptskippy on Thursday June 23, 2016 @02:15PM
(#11963178)
His point is that only one of the browsers was using an ad blocker so they were rendering different content because one rendered ads and the other did not.
Re:Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
by zeta0134 on Thursday June 23, 2016 @03:11PM
(#11963621)
Oh, I totally missed the part where Opera has the ad blocker turned on by default. Ignore my rambling then; my sleepy brain thought he was talking about two browsers that both had different ad blockers installed.
Re:Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
by bialpio on Thursday June 23, 2016 @04:27PM
(#11964052)
Not sure if Opera has it on by default - all they say is that it is build-in so that somehow makes it okay to use it and compare apples to oranges :)
If I understand both tests correctly, Opera ran with adblock and battery saver enabled (those are apparently not default settings), versus Edge without adblock, on sites which supposedly are ad-heavy - this will bias the results towards browser with adblock enabled.
I'd think the user agent string is more likely to cause a huge discrepancy, as many frameworks will be utilizing polyfills and employing different technologies depending on what each browser supports. (Or, in the case of the user agent string, what the framework thinks the browser supports, regardless of how correct its assumptions are.)