Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack
by wikiman on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @08:52AM
(#11953451)
Actually my read on Wasserman's quote (reproduced in another comment) is that superdelegates exist to promote the seating of grassroots delegates, the implied logic being that if the superdelegates weren't delegates, they would simply be elected in place of grassroots delegates with the result being a decrease in their representation (If I were the type to try and be a delegate, I really wouldn't want to run against Obama, Clinton, or Carter in their home districts)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack
by tanderson92 on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @10:04AM
(#11953974)
Right, the two ways of looking at superdelegates that you and I describe are essentially dual. The point is that the purported intent of superdelegates is not to change the outcome (i.e. make the process not 100% democratic), as was claimed above. Now, if that's not true, then the superdelegate system is much more difficult for me to defend, as a party member. I'd be inclined to join a different party, like the Greens.