“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack

Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack by tptacek on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @06:13PM (#11949867)

Yes. That makes a lot of sense. One of the two largest political parties in the US should definitely engage publicly in a debate with "Guccifer2". Why didn't anyone else think of that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack by shard972 on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @02:16AM (#11951903)

Or they can just keep doing what their doing, just keep denying that anything else than the trump files were hacked and everything is fine.

They can do whatever they want, but then people can look at this shitshow of a story and draw their own conclusions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack by blackbagboys on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @06:47PM (#11950080)

If there's credible evidence that the party apparatus had decided that the fix was in from the start, they owe an explanation to their millions of supporters and rank and file members, no matter how silly the hacker's nom de guerre.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Guccifer2”'s second release from DNC hack by tptacek on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @06:56PM (#11950145)

Sorry. I didn't mean to say directly that "Guccifer2" might not be a credible source. More, sort of slyly imply it.

[ Parent | on HN ]