Re:Bought and returned set of WiFi home security cameras; ca...
by zaroth on Sunday June 19, 2016 @10:46PM
(#11935799)
It sounds like what he did had exactly the same effect as "using simple HTML injection to add a rick roll to something".
'But he achieved it using leet hacker skills' should not be a factor in determining the nature of the charge or potential sentence. That's along the lines of making a big deal out of someone using a "Subversion" system to access and maintain code.
Re:Bought and returned set of WiFi home security cameras; ca...
by MBCook on Monday June 20, 2016 @11:19AM
(#11938570)
By "using simple HTML injection" I'm thinking of a form where they don't sanitize input so you could put a <video> tag in the 'name' field and suddenly the video would appear on the page.
Getting access to the administrator account is pretty different.
That's exactly the kind of thing the CFAA was created for.
I agree with the GP that he was harmless, and doesn't deserve anything terribly serious as punishment. But what he did is a lot more than using simple HTML injection to add a rick roll to something.