News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit censorship by minimaxir on Saturday June 18, 2016 @03:00PM (#11930064)
Shadowbans aren't meant for censorship. It's an artifact of old Reddit design for spammers that hasn't been replaced yet. (I know the CEO mentioned that was on the agenda, hence the improved suspension option)

Hacker News does shadowbans too which I am not happy about, but that's another story.

Re:Reddit censorship by dang on Saturday June 18, 2016 @05:06PM (#11930591)
> Hacker News does shadowbans too which I am not happy about, but that's another story.

We almost never do that anymore except in cases of spammers or new accounts that appear to be trolling, i.e. the cases where telling people you banned them tends to be problematic. Apart from those, we almost always post a comment in the thread saying that we banned the account.

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&prefix=false&page=0&date...

Re:Reddit censorship by minimaxir on Saturday June 18, 2016 @05:14PM (#11930626)
I have noticed those comments recently and they are much of an improvement. :)
Re:Reddit censorship by Yver on Saturday June 18, 2016 @03:09PM (#11930102)
I don't see anything that I would describe as "spamming" in that account's history. I can't say what the feature was meant for, but we can see how it's been used.
Re:Reddit censorship by minimaxir on Saturday June 18, 2016 @03:24PM (#11930163)
If you mean the overview screenshot in the article, keep in mind that there is no timestamp on that screenshot. It's possible that the submissions by that user between when the screenshot was taken and the shadowbox may be more questionable.
Re:Reddit censorship by akerro on Saturday June 18, 2016 @03:09PM (#11930099)