Re:The Most and Least Expensive Cars to Maintain
by Tiksi on Saturday June 11, 2016 @03:32PM
(#11884945)
It's usually not much better if a timing belt snaps either. Two valves can't occupy the same space at the same time, so often you get shattered metal everywhere anyways. The difference is that timing chain failures are rare, timing belt failures are expected.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Most and Least Expensive Cars to Maintain
by kagamine on Monday June 13, 2016 @07:19AM
(#11892909)
The country I live in owners change the timing belt before recommended date or else they pretty much can't sell the car for the price they want. It's a bid deal. So much so, that when I sold a car last year I was getting somewhat irritated by the question of it having been done or not (said so in the ad, tyre kickers don't know what else to ask about).
Re:The Most and Least Expensive Cars to Maintain
by colhom on Saturday June 11, 2016 @07:36PM
(#11885914)
It's actually a valve and a piston you have to worry about. At normal engine speeds the valves will simply snap shut if the cam stops spinning.
Valves slapping piston is generally only a worry with an interference engine design.[1]
Re:The Most and Least Expensive Cars to Maintain
by Tiksi on Saturday June 11, 2016 @07:57PM
(#11885971)
Yeah, I was thinking of interference engines, especially OHC/OHV Interference designs. "Timing belt failure" is deeply anchored to Honda engines in my mind, which are pretty much all interference.