News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gawker Files for Bankruptcy, Will Be Put Up for Auction by CM30 on Friday June 10, 2016 @02:06PM (#11878503)
How about the opposite precedent? The idea that if your adversaries don't have money, you can seemingly publish whatever you like (legality and morality be damned) knowing they can't afford to sue you/defeat your large legal team?

The only thing stopping Gawker being crushed before was the fact it had a multi million dollar corporation behind it, and was happy to flat out ignore any complaints they didn't like. Now someone with more money comes along, they get smashed to a pulp and everything somehow changes.

Re:Gawker Files for Bankruptcy, Will Be Put Up for Auction by internaut on Friday June 10, 2016 @04:26PM (#11879725)
Well put. I think a silent majority of journalists are thinking this while their less introspective colleagues reduce the situation to David vs Goliath.

I'm with David Friedman on this.

http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/06/05/ot51-alien-vs-threadato...

Making tort claims marketable solves multiple problems:

1. The tort victim who can’t afford a lawyer. He may be able to get a law firm to take the case for a share of the award, but …

2. How does he know which law firm will do a good job, which do a bad job, which sell him out for some covert payment? If he can sell his claim, all he needs to know is which firm offers him the highest price.

I know some liberals think libertarians are gaga for markets but it seems like this would serve their egalitarian goals as well. Personally I had never considered the potential for the first point but now it seems obvious.