News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by andrewflnr on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @11:08PM (#11867312)
I can't see how to define "accept" except as the opposite of rejection. You can understand what someone is trying to say, but then mock them for saying it "stupidly". You can also just refuse to repeat it. If you accept someone's usage, you probably do neither of these (you might make fun of someone for the heck of it, or not get a chance to use the new term, but you get the idea). Social dynamics, basically. And yes, this metric might produce different answers at different cultural strata.
Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by rhizome on Thursday June 09, 2016 @04:28PM (#11872113)
If you understand what they're saying, you've already "accepted" the meaning/spelling/usage/etc. Turning around and mocking people or refusing to use the term is a separate issue that doesn't necessarily reflect well on that person.
Re:How We Lost User Engagement After a Redesign by andrewflnr on Friday June 10, 2016 @11:09AM (#11876887)
We already have a word for that, though. It's "understand". And while I see what you mean about mockery, refusing to use a term/idiom is everyone's prerogative. I, and probably you as well, simply don't use certain widely accepted phrases because I think they're dumb.

Anyway, I came up with a better definition: accepting a word/usage is believing that it's a good way to express whatever it was.