News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI accused of spying on defense in fraud case. Parent comment

Re:Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI accused of spying on de... by hackuser on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @01:29PM (#11856019)
> the facts suggest

We don't know the facts, only what one side or the other claims.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI accused of spying on de... by xviia on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @01:36PM (#11856078)
Often there are things that "are not in dispute", i.e. both sides agree. That's pretty close to a definition of a fact.

In this case, there is no disagreement that the FBI had CD's containing documents from the defense.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI accused of spying on de... by rosser on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @02:15PM (#11856443)
When both sides of a case "stipulate" to something, as appears to be the case here, for legal purposes, that's about as factual as you're going to get.
[ Parent | on HN ]