No-one except the invitees. The secrecy behind it generates lots of conspiracy theories, but to me it just sounds like a fancy high-flying networking event.

It might be interesting if they released info under Chatham House rules, but that would probably just feed even more conspiracy theories.

To my knowledge the Bilderberg conferences operate under Chatham House rule, with the goal of encouraging openness and information sharing through a certain degree of anonymity to the outside world.

In practice this often means that attendees can reveal what was discussed, but not where, when or from whom they obtained information.

So if you happen to have the chance to talk with an attendee, you could potentially learn what was discussed (ofcourse without any references to where it was discussed) ;-)

Ah I didn't know that they actually were using Chatham House, thanks. There still isn't much information released however ;)

> The secrecy behind it generates lots of conspiracy theories, but to me it just sounds like a fancy high-flying networking event.

I envy your innocence

Can't a group of the rich, the powerful, world leaders, tech titans, special interests, influence peddlers, and "journalists" get together to discuss things in seclusion with no recording devices allowed, without it turning into a conspiracy?

What would the 99.9% be able to do about it if turned out there really was some conspiracy to bleed the world of all its resources, blood, and treasure? Revolt?

"Sire, sire! The peasants are revolting!"

"Yes, they certainly are. Release the drones!"

Just to clarify your quote from the end, I believe its originally from Mel Brooks's "History of the World", the French Revolution chapter.

Count De Monet - I have come on the most urgent of business. It is said that the people are revolting!

King Louis - You said it. They stink on ice.

this is the leaked 2016 topic list (more specifics than the public one) http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-leak-secretive-group-to-d...

There will be loads of great bilderberg coverage on infowars.com they practically broke the story 10 years ago.