Re:Visual Studio Code 1.2 released
by sethammons on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @07:25AM
(#11853703)
Better than sublime, not as good as pycharm. I find it good enough.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
People need to stop comparing text editors (vim, emacs, Sublime Text, VSCode, Atom...) to full featured IDEs (Visual Studio, Intellij Idea/PyCharm/PHPStorm, Eclipse...).
Of course, an IDE is going to have way more features for its language. For a text editor, VSCode has an excellent Python support.
There’s no clear line that separates an editor from an IDE. Editor + language plugin is basically = IDE.
There’s nothing magic about an IDE, it’s just a very, very, bloated editor.
True.
If you look at notepad, emacs, atom, vscode, sublime, vs, webstorm and such, they're all somewhere distributed on a continuum between IDE and editor.
VSCode has a superb Git integration, but what has this to do with an editor?
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.2 released
by intrasight on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @11:36AM
(#11855189)
Yes, that's true. But if you start with a clean slate - like with VSCode - there is less bloat.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.2 released
by Someone1234 on Tuesday June 07, 2016 @10:20AM
(#11854681)
There's nothing wrong with comparing two things that do the same thing.
It is like saying don't compare a car and a truck, they both take you from A to B, they both have different pros and cons, the comparison is apt, even with their dissimilarity.
Same thing here. It absolutely makes sense to compare a fully featured IDE and text editors. They offer the same core service, they just have different benefits and drawbacks.
There will be a lot of people who choose either PyCharm and Sublime/VSCode.