News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sad news today: systemd-resolved to be deployed in Ubuntu... by petepete on Monday June 06, 2016 @06:29AM (#11845702)
I don't think it's really all that bad; several big, popular, widely-deployed distributions are using it and most people appear to be getting on just fine.

It's just that people against it are extremely vocal.

I do dislike the idea of binary logs, though.

Re:Sad news today: systemd-resolved to be deployed in Ubuntu... by fridsun on Wednesday June 08, 2016 @09:02AM (#11861940)
People against it are extremely vocal because it is much harder to work around than previous stuff. Don't like PulseAudio? Use alsa directly is fine, I did in my Arch Linux box. Don't like Flash? HTML5 FTW. Don't like systemd? I have to go to FreeBSD altogether.
Re:Sad news today: systemd-resolved to be deployed in Ubuntu... by pas on Monday June 06, 2016 @09:41AM (#11846663)
I like binary logs. They are faster, which is not a bad thing if you have to grep them. And easy to filter thanks to a fix metadata interface, and so on.

journalctl could use some work, but it can just print JSON, and there's jq.

Re:Sad news today: systemd-resolved to be deployed in Ubuntu... by petepete on Monday June 06, 2016 @10:39AM (#11847085)
Maybe my dislike for binary logs is because I haven't yet learnt the tooling around them.

I'm familiar with dealing with text files in Linux/Unix land and have built up years of knowledge on doing so. I feel reluctant to throw that away.