Re:Nick Farr's 30c3 Jake Appelbaum story of abuse and harass...
by nullc on Sunday June 05, 2016 @09:33PM
(#11844114)
Because they can't be defended against, and especially can't be defended or questioned without being insensitive to the complaints which are supported.
It's a share of what Jake is accused of: making it impossible to criticize or question.
From a perspective of statistics, these allegations are heresay-- and we've heard them elsewhere. The results in well known cognitive biases where evidence gets double counted when someone elses allegation is simply repeated by someone else.
It's a share of what Jake is accused of: making it impossible to criticize or question.
From a perspective of statistics, these allegations are heresay-- and we've heard them elsewhere. The results in well known cognitive biases where evidence gets double counted when someone elses allegation is simply repeated by someone else.